This is directly aimed at one person, the one, the only, the non backer of sheep and women everywhere…..Todd Akin….
His stand not to apologize to rape victims or their families has led sheep to these conclusions. One, he supports the rapists, not the victims, and second, has allowed his fanatical views of baptist and evangelical religion to cloud his better judgement. Both grounds for him to be forced out of office.
As he has not yet come out to say he is for the women who are raped, for their rights to receive proper health care following a rape against their will, that he is not allowing his fanaticism to color his better judgement on these issues, we must demand that he be replaced. He has to know no female in her right mind will support him, his agendas, nor his stand on the issues. Trust us, no amount of spin can undo his words. No amount of constipation by Rush Limbaugh can fix this, nor lines taken from the Karl Rove Play book.
What he has done was to slap each and every rape victim, dead and alive, in the face. He has told them their needs are not valid, their feelings or emotions are not of consequence, their health, or fiscal being matters. Instead, he took the low road that blames the victim, tries to justify unwanted pregnancy by force, ergo the definition of rape. This was not about rape ladies, this was an attack on your rights and civil liberties to receive health care of any kind. Selfish acts, by selfish people.
Cowardice acts by desperite people. So we sheep are launching an attack on this guy, a full on sheep rebellion, on word press. We are demanding he respond. Is he for the rapist, or for the victim? Simple question. There is no inbetween here sir. There is no line in the bible that backs a rapist so your bible belt cannot help you. It might help you hold up your depends, but not your arguement.
There is nothing responsible about rape. It is a violent act against an innocent woman. It is done against her will, and under law is seen as a felony. But this guy says that isn’t enough to put a woman through. He wants them to bear the scarlet letter on thier behinds that says they had sex, and now must bear that child, even if it comes with mental damage, healthrisks of AIDS or HIV, that the woman cannot afford to raise this being. He is not someone you want near a public office, much less latrine.
In his and the minds of the sick and twisted fundy right wingers, they are saving a life. Who saves the life of the woman who was brutally attacked, who must endure the years of mental distress, nightmares, from such an act. Is he and his ilk so blinded by thier twisted faith, they cannot see this is wrong on all accounts? Have they ever walked in the shoes of a rape victim? Has he ever had to go to the parent of the attacked, when it is a child and have to face that parent of such news, that thier flesh and blood was attacked brutally through no fault of her own? Sheep have Sir. It is not the kind of news any parent, husband, uncle, brother or nephew wants to hear.
Those who have been rape victims are forever scarred. Some recover, but not fully. There is no forgiving a rapist or his act. Telling a woman she can’t get pregnant this way? Is he kidding? I forgot, they didn’t teach that in the back woods. They refused to face reality.
This is reality, that this guy has no business being elected to the house, senate, or other. That he cannot see, the harm he would cause, has caused, is beyond disgusting, it is ammoral and no bible will forgive that. There are no words to make up for the insensitive nature of his words. His appology was as hollow as the man. A decent man would never have attacked women again, refusing them after care. Only a coward or rapist himself would do this. So I ask again, does he side with the victim or the rapist? It is a yes or no question.